In the 19th century, the variation of the Renaissance of Bengal has led to the convergence of multicultural analysis among historians. Whether there is any truth in a particular historical event, the versatile nature of its observations unfolds different aspects of its character.The historic era of Bengal initiated a complex whirl of controversy over the authenticity of the Renaissance or the emergence of the Renaissance. Because different interpretations of different types of questions have arisen, and are being explored in a new way to solve these questions. Famous historian E. H. Carr says that where the disputes arise among experts, the new horizons of discoveries are opened. Therefore, this historic time must be seen in a neutral point of view so that a clear idea can reach a fundamental truth.
Historian Jacob Burkhart says that Renaissance is the equivalent of modernity. Overall, Renaissance is a modification of the age of classical era. Among the historians, there is considerable disagreement about the nature of Renaissance.
It is so confused about the advent and completion of the Italian Renaissance. Where the importance of the Renaissance as a reason for the European era began, there was considerable disagreement among the historians.There is considerable confusion about the basicity of the Renaissance feature. According to many historians, the Renaissance is the resurrection of classical culture. On the other hand, many historians have said that the Renaissance is a medieval culture achieving modernization. So, the role of Renaissance as the first step of modernization in world history is enough. But the concept of Humanism was later reconciled with the concept of Renaissance. The concept of Humanism came as a result of an evaluation of classical literature. This resulted in the emergence of new life philosophy. Humanistic scholars churned classical literature and created unified life philosophy, excluding religious teachings.
The emergence of Renaissance in Europe at the moment of the end of medieval feudalism and the development of a city-centric bourgeois economy.According to historians, this theory is Marxist. According to these historians, there is a need to check the authenticity of this Marxist theory. However, the development of European Renaissance has been seen overall in the Italian Society of Culture. The ultimate release of the Renaissance is seen by the artists. It can be said that the Renaissance reached the peak in the art world. In the nineteenth century, there was considerable opposition in the historical field about the nature of the renaissance in Bengal. But it is true that at this time there were some particular intellectual incidents in Bengal. It is undeniable that Renaissance in Bengal has been polarized in the historians. Some historians believe that Renaissance actually happened in Bengal in the nineteenth century.
On the other hand, some historians say that the Renaissance of Bengal is nothing but a myth. Historical views of the two parties have been reviewed by the fact that every historian has judged the Renaissance of Bengal on its own criteria, resulting in confusion. Since the word Renaissance is a European concept, then in order to apply this concept in Bengal, we must speak in conformity with the Italian Renaissance.Although the difference between time and perspective in these two renaissances is enough. Because of the period of European Renaissance, we have been able to determine from the fourteenth century to the sixteenth centuries. On the other hand, the period of Bengali Renaissance was very later, in the nineteenth century.Similarly, the main centre of the Indian Renaissance was Bengal and its centralization took place in the city of Kolkata.
In the nineteenth century, how the Renaissance of Bengal was able to influence the then society, we can see later, through the emergence of nationalism.We can consider this nationalism as the best contribution of Renaissance. But apparently, no social and political radical change can be seen as the result of European Renaissance. One of the reasons for this is that most of the Italian Renaissance have appeared and influenced by the artists. But Renaissance roamed in Bengal for contemporary literature. This literature influenced the social minds of that time. The benefits of the renaissance of thoughts of Bengal as well as the one's tune was found later, during the nationalist movement.
On the other hand, there has been considerable debate about the centre or origin of Renaissance in Bengal, among historians.The European Renaissance was centred around Italy and its main centre was Florence. Similarly, the main centre of the Indian Renaissance was Bengal and its centralization took place in the city of Calcutta. It can be said that in the nineteenth century Calcutta had a special role in the centre of higher intellectual thoughts. But it can not be said that Calcutta easily became the controller of the Renaissance. Renaissance spread out in many places outside of Calcutta. During this time, Renaissance activity was observed in Murshidabad. The role of the elite class of Calcutta, which is quite significant in Renaissance in Bengal. But it would be wrong to say that there is only the role of the elite class of Calcutta because many elite classes have brought an active role outside of Calcutta. The importance of the elite class as a fundamental basis for the Renaissance is undeniable. In the era of the colonial economy, without the support of the nobility, the conservative form of the Renaissance was not possible.But in this context, it can not be said that due to the direct role of the common people, there was no Renaissance in Bengal in the nineteenth century.It may be said that the direct role of the people of the European Renaissance was very low. Humanitarian scientific thinking like Europe was born in 19th century Bengal too.
Instead of a religious supernatural explanation, the world of scientific real and human-centred thought emerged. Curiosity search is a key feature of Renaissance with a scientific approach to all matters. In India, medieval dark prejudice and obstruction made India's life bound. The social life became sluggish in this situation. It was not possible to overcome this wall by any single effort. Together with the presence of many outstanding talents could illuminate this dark life could be said to be possible in the nineteenth century Bengal.
There was a deep relation of the nineteenth century Renaissance with the Hindu Revolutionary Pledge Movement. Many greats, at that time, tried to remove the ruthlessness of the Hindu religion. This gives us new explanations of Vedas philosophy of ancient classical era. Italian Renaissance was the classical Greek and Roman life-oriented philosophical revival. In the nineteenth century, Raja Rammohon Roy, Vidyasagar, Swami Vivekananda started the interpretation of ancient books such as Veda- Upanishad, to free Hindu religion from prejudice to Hinduism.Rishi Bankimchandra Chattopadhyay reorganized and analyzed the mythological character. He analyzed the different characters of Mahabharata and explained it. In the nineteenth century, the advent of Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa Dev was a huge change in the religious world.There is a special reason to discuss the contribution of Sri Ramakrishnadev in the discussion of Renaissance. When Bengal came in the time when the religious prejudice was upsetting the lives of ordinary people in the Bengal. Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsadeva reveals a humanistic dogma by pushing all religious superstitions and darkness away so that ordinary people can develop their personality and go on the path of absolute religion. This religious humanist philosophy has attracted the common people and people of the elite community. And later, Swami Vivekananda, a great disciple of Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa Dev, spread the message of humanistic philosophy to the whole world. And this religious belief attracted people from both native and foreign countries. Swami Vivekananda philosophically explains the complex philosophical theories such as Vedanta philosophy, Patanjali philosophy or Advaita philosophy which Swami Vivekananda had explained in detail. It can be said that he played an appropriate role in the Renaissance of Bengal.
At this time, Western culture began to be widely circulated in India. Along with Western culture, the bourgeoisie economy has entered into India this time. This bourgeois economy influenced the socio-culture of India and emerged as a special regulator for Renaissance.However, there is considerable debate among historians about the role of the bourgeois economy as the regulator of Renaissance. The scholars, who are quite disagreements with the Renaissance man, have a big role or an important role in the economy for the advent of Renaissance. It can not be said with a force that the bourgeois economy helped in the development of the Renaissance. It may be said, however, that when the development of the bourgeois economy started in Bengal, then did some people or some great persons, emerge, who had their direct influence on Bengal Renaissance. But it is a matter of great disagreement that the bourgeois economy was responsible for the development of the talent of these successful people. But it can be said that city culture is essential for the advent of Renaissance and patronage of the business class is very important for this.
In the nineteenth century, Western education was introduced in the Bengal. Some historians believe that Western English education is particularly responsible for the Renaissance in Bengal. But there is considerable debate among historians. According to many historians, oriental studies and oriental reforms are responsible for Renaissance. But it is undeniable that the Renaissance figures were educated in Western education. These Renaissance personalities were educated in western education and started a new analysis of Orientalism.According to many, these Renaissance figures analyzed Orientalism with Western knowledge. That is these historians, who want to see Western knowledge as the role of the driver of the Renaissance in Bengal. Due to these different theories, there have been serious debates about the renaissance of Bengal.
A fundamental feature of the Renaissance is the transition from medieval perspective to modernism. Historical observations show that Renaissance was a period of time between Bengali medieval and modern times.In the second half of the nineteenth century, historians have identified the early period of modernity in the Bengal. Many times, Western culture is involved with modernity. But there is considerable disagreement with this theory.
But it is undeniable that the Bengal Renaissance enlightened people. In reality, people were illuminated by that light and illuminated the darkness in the light of truth. In the nineteenth century, the historical significance of the restrictions of Bengal Renaissance can be given with due importance and it is said that in this century the renaissance of Bengal is given by us as the reason that we can call the Bengali classical era. Therefore, this renaissance of Bengal demands sufficient references in the history of Bengal.
However, in the nineteenth century, the Renaissance took place in Bengal, but it has been associated with positive negative or moderate theories of its cause or advent. We could say that this Renaissance was bound among some elite human beings of India and it was said that the public was far away from the light of this Renaissance. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the modernity of modern India, or Bengal, came in the nineteenth century Renaissance.
Historian Jacob Burkhart says that Renaissance is the equivalent of modernity. Overall, Renaissance is a modification of the age of classical era. Among the historians, there is considerable disagreement about the nature of Renaissance.
It is so confused about the advent and completion of the Italian Renaissance. Where the importance of the Renaissance as a reason for the European era began, there was considerable disagreement among the historians.There is considerable confusion about the basicity of the Renaissance feature. According to many historians, the Renaissance is the resurrection of classical culture. On the other hand, many historians have said that the Renaissance is a medieval culture achieving modernization. So, the role of Renaissance as the first step of modernization in world history is enough. But the concept of Humanism was later reconciled with the concept of Renaissance. The concept of Humanism came as a result of an evaluation of classical literature. This resulted in the emergence of new life philosophy. Humanistic scholars churned classical literature and created unified life philosophy, excluding religious teachings.
The emergence of Renaissance in Europe at the moment of the end of medieval feudalism and the development of a city-centric bourgeois economy.According to historians, this theory is Marxist. According to these historians, there is a need to check the authenticity of this Marxist theory. However, the development of European Renaissance has been seen overall in the Italian Society of Culture. The ultimate release of the Renaissance is seen by the artists. It can be said that the Renaissance reached the peak in the art world. In the nineteenth century, there was considerable opposition in the historical field about the nature of the renaissance in Bengal. But it is true that at this time there were some particular intellectual incidents in Bengal. It is undeniable that Renaissance in Bengal has been polarized in the historians. Some historians believe that Renaissance actually happened in Bengal in the nineteenth century.
On the other hand, some historians say that the Renaissance of Bengal is nothing but a myth. Historical views of the two parties have been reviewed by the fact that every historian has judged the Renaissance of Bengal on its own criteria, resulting in confusion. Since the word Renaissance is a European concept, then in order to apply this concept in Bengal, we must speak in conformity with the Italian Renaissance.Although the difference between time and perspective in these two renaissances is enough. Because of the period of European Renaissance, we have been able to determine from the fourteenth century to the sixteenth centuries. On the other hand, the period of Bengali Renaissance was very later, in the nineteenth century.Similarly, the main centre of the Indian Renaissance was Bengal and its centralization took place in the city of Kolkata.
In the nineteenth century, how the Renaissance of Bengal was able to influence the then society, we can see later, through the emergence of nationalism.We can consider this nationalism as the best contribution of Renaissance. But apparently, no social and political radical change can be seen as the result of European Renaissance. One of the reasons for this is that most of the Italian Renaissance have appeared and influenced by the artists. But Renaissance roamed in Bengal for contemporary literature. This literature influenced the social minds of that time. The benefits of the renaissance of thoughts of Bengal as well as the one's tune was found later, during the nationalist movement.
On the other hand, there has been considerable debate about the centre or origin of Renaissance in Bengal, among historians.The European Renaissance was centred around Italy and its main centre was Florence. Similarly, the main centre of the Indian Renaissance was Bengal and its centralization took place in the city of Calcutta. It can be said that in the nineteenth century Calcutta had a special role in the centre of higher intellectual thoughts. But it can not be said that Calcutta easily became the controller of the Renaissance. Renaissance spread out in many places outside of Calcutta. During this time, Renaissance activity was observed in Murshidabad. The role of the elite class of Calcutta, which is quite significant in Renaissance in Bengal. But it would be wrong to say that there is only the role of the elite class of Calcutta because many elite classes have brought an active role outside of Calcutta. The importance of the elite class as a fundamental basis for the Renaissance is undeniable. In the era of the colonial economy, without the support of the nobility, the conservative form of the Renaissance was not possible.But in this context, it can not be said that due to the direct role of the common people, there was no Renaissance in Bengal in the nineteenth century.It may be said that the direct role of the people of the European Renaissance was very low. Humanitarian scientific thinking like Europe was born in 19th century Bengal too.
Instead of a religious supernatural explanation, the world of scientific real and human-centred thought emerged. Curiosity search is a key feature of Renaissance with a scientific approach to all matters. In India, medieval dark prejudice and obstruction made India's life bound. The social life became sluggish in this situation. It was not possible to overcome this wall by any single effort. Together with the presence of many outstanding talents could illuminate this dark life could be said to be possible in the nineteenth century Bengal.
There was a deep relation of the nineteenth century Renaissance with the Hindu Revolutionary Pledge Movement. Many greats, at that time, tried to remove the ruthlessness of the Hindu religion. This gives us new explanations of Vedas philosophy of ancient classical era. Italian Renaissance was the classical Greek and Roman life-oriented philosophical revival. In the nineteenth century, Raja Rammohon Roy, Vidyasagar, Swami Vivekananda started the interpretation of ancient books such as Veda- Upanishad, to free Hindu religion from prejudice to Hinduism.Rishi Bankimchandra Chattopadhyay reorganized and analyzed the mythological character. He analyzed the different characters of Mahabharata and explained it. In the nineteenth century, the advent of Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa Dev was a huge change in the religious world.There is a special reason to discuss the contribution of Sri Ramakrishnadev in the discussion of Renaissance. When Bengal came in the time when the religious prejudice was upsetting the lives of ordinary people in the Bengal. Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsadeva reveals a humanistic dogma by pushing all religious superstitions and darkness away so that ordinary people can develop their personality and go on the path of absolute religion. This religious humanist philosophy has attracted the common people and people of the elite community. And later, Swami Vivekananda, a great disciple of Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa Dev, spread the message of humanistic philosophy to the whole world. And this religious belief attracted people from both native and foreign countries. Swami Vivekananda philosophically explains the complex philosophical theories such as Vedanta philosophy, Patanjali philosophy or Advaita philosophy which Swami Vivekananda had explained in detail. It can be said that he played an appropriate role in the Renaissance of Bengal.
At this time, Western culture began to be widely circulated in India. Along with Western culture, the bourgeoisie economy has entered into India this time. This bourgeois economy influenced the socio-culture of India and emerged as a special regulator for Renaissance.However, there is considerable debate among historians about the role of the bourgeois economy as the regulator of Renaissance. The scholars, who are quite disagreements with the Renaissance man, have a big role or an important role in the economy for the advent of Renaissance. It can not be said with a force that the bourgeois economy helped in the development of the Renaissance. It may be said, however, that when the development of the bourgeois economy started in Bengal, then did some people or some great persons, emerge, who had their direct influence on Bengal Renaissance. But it is a matter of great disagreement that the bourgeois economy was responsible for the development of the talent of these successful people. But it can be said that city culture is essential for the advent of Renaissance and patronage of the business class is very important for this.
In the nineteenth century, Western education was introduced in the Bengal. Some historians believe that Western English education is particularly responsible for the Renaissance in Bengal. But there is considerable debate among historians. According to many historians, oriental studies and oriental reforms are responsible for Renaissance. But it is undeniable that the Renaissance figures were educated in Western education. These Renaissance personalities were educated in western education and started a new analysis of Orientalism.According to many, these Renaissance figures analyzed Orientalism with Western knowledge. That is these historians, who want to see Western knowledge as the role of the driver of the Renaissance in Bengal. Due to these different theories, there have been serious debates about the renaissance of Bengal.
A fundamental feature of the Renaissance is the transition from medieval perspective to modernism. Historical observations show that Renaissance was a period of time between Bengali medieval and modern times.In the second half of the nineteenth century, historians have identified the early period of modernity in the Bengal. Many times, Western culture is involved with modernity. But there is considerable disagreement with this theory.
But it is undeniable that the Bengal Renaissance enlightened people. In reality, people were illuminated by that light and illuminated the darkness in the light of truth. In the nineteenth century, the historical significance of the restrictions of Bengal Renaissance can be given with due importance and it is said that in this century the renaissance of Bengal is given by us as the reason that we can call the Bengali classical era. Therefore, this renaissance of Bengal demands sufficient references in the history of Bengal.
However, in the nineteenth century, the Renaissance took place in Bengal, but it has been associated with positive negative or moderate theories of its cause or advent. We could say that this Renaissance was bound among some elite human beings of India and it was said that the public was far away from the light of this Renaissance. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the modernity of modern India, or Bengal, came in the nineteenth century Renaissance.
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
No comments:
Post a Comment